Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
vs
LovableLow-Code & No-Code
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Kilo Code vs Lovable
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kilo Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0 for Lovable.
Choose Kilo Code if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0)
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 40% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
Choose Lovable if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2022 or AIUC-1 coverage
- rapid prototyping and idea validation
- generates working software from plain-English descriptions
- AI-generated code you can eventually own
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kilo Code | Lovable |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 0% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #17 | #44 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 0 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kilo Code 0pp · Lovable 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kilo Code leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Kilo CodeLovable
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Kilo Code ranked higher
0Lovable ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kilo Code | Lovable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted | Cloud-hosted platform operated by Lovable, also available through Google Cloud Marketplace and Gemini Enterprise. |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, AIUC-1 |
| Support | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan | Dedicated support on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| Headquarters | — | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed · $8M raised | Series C · $950M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. | People without a deep coding background who want to build apps and websites quickly, and enterprise teams that need admin and security controls. |
Plans side by side
Kilo Code
Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Lovable
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Lovable
- rapid prototyping and idea validation
- generates working software from plain-English descriptions
- AI-generated code you can eventually own
- listed among top low-code and no-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kilo Code vs Lovable”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kilo-code-vs-lovable, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.