Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
vs
OpenCodeThe open source AI coding agent
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Kilo Code vs OpenCode
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kilo Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0.9 for OpenCode, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Kilo Code if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose OpenCode if…
- You want a lower entry price ($10 vs $15)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- publishes specific credit or request allowances
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kilo Code | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 0.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #17 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kilo Code 0pp · OpenCode 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kilo Code leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Kilo CodeOpenCode
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Kilo Code ranked higher
1OpenCode ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Kilo Code | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI coding assistant has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #6 | #5 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kilo Code | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $10 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted | Terminal, desktop app, web and IDE extension |
| Integrations | — | 75+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2 |
| Support | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan | Documentation, GitHub issues |
| Funding | Seed · $8M raised | Pre-Seed |
| Best for | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. | Developers who want to swap between AI models, including free, hosted and local options |
Plans side by side
Kilo Code
Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
OpenCode
- publishes specific credit or request allowances
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kilo Code vs OpenCode”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kilo-code-vs-opencode, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.