Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
vs
TabbyOpensource, self-hosted AI coding assistant
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Kilo Code vs Tabby
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kilo Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0.3 for Tabby.
Choose Kilo Code if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0.3)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $19)
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Choose Tabby if…
- privacy and self-hosting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kilo Code | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #17 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kilo Code 0pp · Tabby 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kilo Code leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Kilo CodeTabby
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Kilo Code ranked higher
0Tabby ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kilo Code | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted | Self-hosted on-premises or in the cloud, with no external DBMS or cloud services required |
| Support | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan | Community Slack, Email support, Dedicated Slack channel |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | — | 11–50 |
| Funding | Seed · $8M raised | Seed · $7M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. | Developers and teams who want a self-hosted, open-source alternative to GitHub Copilot and need to keep control of their code and infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
Kilo Code
Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Tabby
Community$0per month, free open source
Team$19per seat per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Tabby
- privacy and self-hosting
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kilo Code vs Tabby”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kilo-code-vs-tabby, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.