Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
vs
TabnineAI Coding Assistants
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Kilo Code vs Tabnine
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tabnine is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 16 versus 5.3 for Kilo Code.
Choose Kilo Code if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 38% positive)
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Choose Tabnine if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16 vs 5.3)
- You need GDPR or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 27001 or SOC 2 coverage
- Strong privacy and protection of proprietary code
- Air-gapped, on-premises, and local deployment options
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Kilo Code | Tabnine |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.3% | 16% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #17 | #6 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 6.3% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 29 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Kilo Code 0pp · Tabnine 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tabnine leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Kilo CodeTabnine
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Kilo Code ranked higher
0Tabnine ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Kilo Code | Tabnine |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted | SaaS, VPC, on-premises and air-gapped |
| Compliance | — | GDPR, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 |
| Support | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan | — |
| Funding | Seed · $8M raised | Series B · $55M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. | — |
Plans side by side
Kilo Code
Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Tabnine
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Tabnine
- Strong privacy and protection of proprietary code
- Air-gapped, on-premises, and local deployment options
- Popular with enterprise and regulated teams
- Straightforward flat-rate pricing
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Kilo Code vs Tabnine”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/kilo-code-vs-tabnine, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.