LangChainThe open agent platform to own your intelligence
vs
LlamaIndexTurn any document into agent-ready context.
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
LangChain vs LlamaIndex
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LangChain is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 10.4 versus 2.2 for LlamaIndex, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose LangChain if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.4 vs 2.2)
- You want a lower entry price ($39 vs $50)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose LlamaIndex if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (20% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Premier choice for RAG-centric agents
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LangChain | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.4% | 2.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #12 | #41 |
| Share of voice | 2.7% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 18 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 20% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LangChain 0pp · LlamaIndex 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LangChain leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LangChainLlamaIndex
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
2LangChain ranked higher
0LlamaIndex ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | LangChain | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading AI Agents platforms | AI Mode | #2 | #5 |
| Who makes the most used AI agent platform? | ChatGPT | #7 | #8 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LangChain | LlamaIndex |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $39 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $50 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), hybrid (SaaS control plane with self-hosted data plane), or self-hosted in the customer's VPC | LlamaParse runs as SaaS on a secure cloud tenant, or can be deployed in a customer's private VPC across cloud providers. |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | Community forum, Support portal, Email support, Slack | Community, Basic (email), Priority (Slack Connect), Dedicated |
| Founded | 2023 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B, led by IVP | Strategic minority equity investments (Databricks, KPMG) · $28M raised |
| Best for | Teams building agents that need control over models, context, memory and deployment, and the ability to test, govern and improve them in production | Teams in document-heavy industries such as finance, insurance, healthcare and manufacturing that need accurate parsing of complex tables, charts and scanned pages. |
Plans side by side
LangChain
Developer$0seat per month, then pay as you go
Plus$39seat per month, then pay as you go
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, then pay as you go
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LangChain
- Stateful multi-agent orchestration via state graphs
- Strong open-source adoption with large download numbers
- Suited to enterprise agent loops
- Heavy developer framework that requires coding
LlamaIndex
- Premier choice for RAG-centric agents
- Named as a popular agent development framework
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LangChain vs LlamaIndex”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/langchain-vs-llamaindex, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.