Skip to content
SlateIndex
LangChainThe open agent platform to own your intelligence
vs
OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3

LangChain vs OutSystems

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

LangChain is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 10.4 versus 2.8 for OutSystems, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose LangChain if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.4 vs 2.8)
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Stateful multi-agent orchestration via state graphs
  • Strong open-source adoption with large download numbers

Choose OutSystems if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 17% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or GDPR or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric LangChain OutSystems
Visibility score10.4%2.8%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Agents#12#32
Share of voice2.7%0.8%
Mentions this run185
Positive in AI answers17%42%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3LangChain 10%

LangChain 0pp · OutSystems 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

LangChain leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
12.6%
0%
AI Mode
13.3%
0%
Perplexity
5.2%
8.5%
LangChainOutSystems

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

1LangChain ranked higher
0OutSystems ranked higher
PromptEngineLangChainOutSystems
Official website of the top AI agent platform vendors Perplexity#12#20

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionLangChainOutSystems
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry priceFree; paid from $39 per seat / moContact sales
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloud (SaaS), hybrid (SaaS control plane with self-hosted data plane), or self-hosted in the customer's VPCCloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans
Integrations—400+
Compliance—SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE)
SupportCommunity forum, Support portal, Email support, Slack—
Founded20232001
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesBoston, Massachusetts, United States
Employees201–5001,001–5,000
FundingSeries B, led by IVPSeries F, led by KKR
Best forTeams building agents that need control over models, context, memory and deployment, and the ability to test, govern and improve them in productionRegulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust

Plans side by side

LangChain

Developer$0seat per month, then pay as you go
Plus$39seat per month, then pay as you go
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing, then pay as you go
LangChain pricing

OutSystems

OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
OutSystems pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

LangChain

  • Stateful multi-agent orchestration via state graphs
  • Strong open-source adoption with large download numbers
  • Suited to enterprise agent loops
  • Heavy developer framework that requires coding

OutSystems

  • Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
  • High performance and speed in app delivery
  • Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
  • Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
  • Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
  • Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
  • High cost for enterprise tiers

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “LangChain vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/langchain-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.