LangChain vs Palantir
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LangChain is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 10.4 versus 1.2 for Palantir, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose LangChain if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.4 vs 1.2)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Stateful multi-agent orchestration via state graphs
- Strong open-source adoption with large download numbers
Choose Palantir if…
- You need FedRAMP High or FISMA High or DoD IL5 or DoD IL6 or CMMC Level 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or HIPAA or GDPR coverage
- Included in ISG's evaluated vendor landscape
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LangChain | Palantir |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.4% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #12 | #53 |
| Share of voice | 2.7% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 18 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LangChain 0pp · Palantir 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LangChain leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | LangChain | Palantir |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI Agents vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #21 | #9 |
| Official website of the top AI agent platform vendors | ChatGPT | #24 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LangChain | Palantir |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $39 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS), hybrid (SaaS control plane with self-hosted data plane), or self-hosted in the customer's VPC | Apollo deployment foundation used across highly secure and regulated environments, including FedRAMP, IL5 and IL6. |
| Compliance | — | FedRAMP High, FISMA High, DoD IL5, DoD IL6, CMMC Level 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | Community forum, Support portal, Email support, Slack | — |
| Founded | 2023 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | — |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Series B, led by IVP | Post-IPO equity round led by ARK Investment Management · $2460M raised |
| Best for | Teams building agents that need control over models, context, memory and deployment, and the ability to test, govern and improve them in production | Federal agencies, state and local governments, international organizations and private companies. |
Plans side by side
LangChain
Palantir
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LangChain
- Stateful multi-agent orchestration via state graphs
- Strong open-source adoption with large download numbers
- Suited to enterprise agent loops
- Heavy developer framework that requires coding
Palantir
- Included in ISG's evaluated vendor landscape
- Placed in ISG's Merit tier, not the top tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LangChain vs Palantir”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/langchain-vs-palantir, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.