LangSmith vs OutSystems
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
LangSmith is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 3 versus 2.8 for OutSystems, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose LangSmith if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3 vs 2.8)
- You need ISO 27001 (Engine feature) coverage
- strong production observability
- tracing, debugging and response evaluation
Choose OutSystems if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 17% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or PCI DSS or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LangSmith | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #31 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LangSmith 0pp · OutSystems 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
LangSmith leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | LangSmith | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top AI agent platform vendors | Perplexity | #14 | #20 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LangSmith | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, Bring Your Own Cloud, and Self-hosted | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001 (Engine feature) | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) |
| Founded | — | 2001 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Series B | Series F, led by KKR |
| Best for | — | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust |
Plans side by side
LangSmith
Pricing not available.
OutSystems
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LangSmith
- strong production observability
- tracing, debugging and response evaluation
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LangSmith vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/langsmith-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.