LindyHire an AI Employee That Gets Work Done
vs
OneReach.aiAgentic Orchestration Platform for the Enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Lindy vs OneReach.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Lindy is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 7.4 versus 1 for OneReach.ai.
Choose Lindy if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.4 vs 1)
- You need HIPAA or GDPR or PIPEDA coverage
- autonomous execution of end-to-end workflows
- functions like a digital teammate
Choose OneReach.ai if…
- You need UK Cyber Essentials or HITRUST coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Lindy | OneReach.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 7.4% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #17 | #58 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 12 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Lindy 0pp · OneReach.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Lindy leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LindyOneReach.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Lindy ranked higher
0OneReach.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Lindy | OneReach.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $29.99 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted | Dedicated Private Environment hosted in the customer's cloud or managed by OneReach, on public, private, government or sovereign infrastructure. |
| Integrations | 1500+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, PIPEDA | SOC 2 Type II, UK Cyber Essentials, HITRUST |
| Support | Live onboarding on the Team plan, Dedicated support on the Enterprise plan, Onboarding and enablement on the Enterprise plan, Documentation | 24/7 support is standard across managed, infrastructure-only and combined service models |
| Founded | 2023 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Denver, CO |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Unspecified round | Private equity round led by LoneTree Capital (listed as Growth Equity by Caplight) |
| Best for | Teams that run recurring multi-tool work such as reporting, support triage, reconciliation and incident follow-up. | Large enterprises, especially in regulated industries such as government, finance and healthcare, that need many AI agents governed, costed and reused under central IT control. |
Plans side by side
Lindy
Free$0one-time free credits, no credit card required
Team$29.99user per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
OneReach.ai
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Lindy
- autonomous execution of end-to-end workflows
- functions like a digital teammate
- free trial with credits, no card needed
- highest average review rating (4.9/5 on G2)
OneReach.ai
- strong contender for building and managing conversational and automated agent architectures
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Lindy vs OneReach.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/lindy-vs-onereach-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.