LlamaIndexTurn any document into agent-ready context.
vs
OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
LlamaIndex vs OutSystems
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 2.2 for LlamaIndex.
Choose LlamaIndex if…
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Premier choice for RAG-centric agents
- Named as a popular agent development framework
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 2.2)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 20% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or PCI DSS or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | LlamaIndex | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #41 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 20% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
LlamaIndex 0pp · OutSystems 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
LlamaIndexOutSystems
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0LlamaIndex ranked higher
0OutSystems ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | LlamaIndex | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $50 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | LlamaParse runs as SaaS on a secure cloud tenant, or can be deployed in a customer's private VPC across cloud providers. | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) |
| Support | Community, Basic (email), Priority (Slack Connect), Dedicated | — |
| Founded | — | 2001 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, United States | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Strategic minority equity investments (Databricks, KPMG) · $28M raised | Series F, led by KKR |
| Best for | Teams in document-heavy industries such as finance, insurance, healthcare and manufacturing that need accurate parsing of complex tables, charts and scanned pages. | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust |
Plans side by side
OutSystems
OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
LlamaIndex
- Premier choice for RAG-centric agents
- Named as a popular agent development framework
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “LlamaIndex vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/llamaindex-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.