Lucky OrangeLucky Orange gives you heatmaps, session recordings and more, plus Discovery AI to connect them into a direct answer.
vs
Quantum MetricExperience context for AI
Comparison · Product Analytics · weekly run Nov 3
Lucky Orange vs Quantum Metric
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Quantum Metric is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 0 for Lucky Orange.
Choose Lucky Orange if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for conversion optimization
- Basic free tier or trial options
Choose Quantum Metric if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 0)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 27001 or HITRUST coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Lucky Orange | Quantum Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | down−2.1% | New |
| Rank in Product Analytics | #28 | #21 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Lucky Orange −2.1pp · Quantum Metric +1.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Quantum Metric leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Lucky OrangeQuantum Metric
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Lucky Orange ranked higher
0Quantum Metric ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Lucky Orange | Quantum Metric |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-based service |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 27001, HITRUST |
| Support | — | Dedicated account management and customer success team, Onboarding under industry-specific playbooks, Expert-led and self-guided training, Ongoing consultation with customer success experts |
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Overland Park, Kansas, US | Colorado Springs, Colorado, US |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Seed | Series B |
| Best for | Website owners and teams who want to see why visitors leave and what to fix first. | Enterprise CX, product, UX, marketing and development teams in retail, financial services, travel and hospitality, telco, gaming and healthcare. |
Plans side by side
Lucky Orange
Free$0month
Launch$19month, paid monthly
Build$39month, paid monthly ($32/mo paid annually)
Grow$89month, paid monthly ($72/mo paid annually)
Expand$249month, paid monthly ($199/mo paid annually)
Scale$1,049month, paid monthly ($839/mo paid annually)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Quantum Metric
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote (based on session volume and digital properties)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Lucky Orange
- Best for conversion optimization
- Basic free tier or trial options
- Among the strongest-reviewed product analytics tools
Quantum Metric
- Blends quantitative product analytics with qualitative context like session replays and error monitoring
- Strong recognition from analysts and research
- Best for enterprise digital experience and session replay
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Lucky Orange vs Quantum Metric”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/lucky-orange-vs-quantum-metric, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.