Lucky OrangeLucky Orange gives you heatmaps, session recordings and more, plus Discovery AI to connect them into a direct answer.
vs
UXCamProduct analytics that gives you answers
Comparison · Product Analytics · weekly run Nov 3
Lucky Orange vs UXCam
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
UXCam is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0 for Lucky Orange.
Choose Lucky Orange if…
- You need CCPA coverage
- Best for conversion optimization
- Basic free tier or trial options
- Among the strongest-reviewed product analytics tools
Choose UXCam if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA (signs a BAA) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Strong for mobile-first products needing screen-level and touch-level analysis
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Lucky Orange | UXCam |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | down−2.1% | down−1.2% |
| Rank in Product Analytics | #28 | #20 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Lucky Orange −2.1pp · UXCam −1.2000000000000002pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
UXCam leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Lucky OrangeUXCam
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Lucky Orange ranked higher
0UXCam ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Lucky Orange | UXCam |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-hosted, with data hosting in the EU, USA or UAE |
| Compliance | GDPR, CCPA | SOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA (signs a BAA) |
| Support | — | Guided onboarding and integration support, Demo with an expert |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Overland Park, Kansas, US | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Seed | Seed (led by Headline) · $5M raised |
| Best for | Website owners and teams who want to see why visitors leave and what to fix first. | Product managers, growth marketers, engineers and customer support teams working on mobile apps and websites |
Plans side by side
Lucky Orange
Free$0month
Launch$19month, paid monthly
Build$39month, paid monthly ($32/mo paid annually)
Grow$89month, paid monthly ($72/mo paid annually)
Expand$249month, paid monthly ($199/mo paid annually)
Scale$1,049month, paid monthly ($839/mo paid annually)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
UXCam
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Lucky Orange
- Best for conversion optimization
- Basic free tier or trial options
- Among the strongest-reviewed product analytics tools
UXCam
- Strong for mobile-first products needing screen-level and touch-level analysis
- Offers a 14-day free trial
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Lucky Orange vs UXCam”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/lucky-orange-vs-uxcam, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.