Marqo vs Qdrant
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qdrant is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 60.5 versus 0.7 for Marqo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Marqo if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
Choose Qdrant if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.5 vs 0.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (68% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Marqo | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 60.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #25 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 13.4% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 63 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 68% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Marqo 0pp · Qdrant 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qdrant leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Marqo | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top vector database vendors | ChatGPT | #6 | #3 |
| Official website of the top vector database vendors | Perplexity | #14 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Marqo | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Deployed via API or one-click integrations with commerce platforms | Managed cloud, hybrid cloud, private cloud (air-gapped), self-hosted on-premises, and edge |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA |
| Support | Talk to a search expert, Book a 30-minute demo with a live proof-of-concept on your own catalog | Community support via Discord on the free tier, Standard tier: email and ticket portal, 10x5 business hours, Premium tier: 24/7 support with private Slack, Discord or Teams channels, Enterprise tier: custom response SLA and advisory services |
| Founded | 2022 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, USA | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A · $18M raised | Series B · $88M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise retail brands with large product catalogs in fashion, beauty, electronics and home goods | Developers and teams building RAG, semantic search and recommendation systems that need hybrid search and metadata filtering, either self-hosted or managed |
Plans side by side
Marqo
Pricing not available.
Qdrant
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Marqo
Profile in progress.
Qdrant
- High performance and memory efficiency, written in Rust
- Strong metadata and complex payload filtering
- Free tier for prototyping and testing
- Open-source option with flexible self-hosting
- Strong default choice for startups and production RAG
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Marqo vs Qdrant”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/marqo-vs-qdrant, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.