MetabaseOpen source AI analytics you can verify
vs
TeradataTurn intelligence into autonomous action
Comparison · Data Warehouse · weekly run Nov 3
Metabase vs Teradata
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Teradata is the stronger AI pick in Data Warehouse: it has a visibility score of 5.7 versus 2 for Metabase.
Choose Metabase if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (63% vs 36% positive)
- You need SOC 1 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Free open-source edition for self-hosting
- Easy to deploy and user-friendly
Choose Teradata if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.7 vs 2)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need TX-RAMP or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or IRAP PROTECTED or FedRAMP Ready at Moderate impact level on AWS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Metabase | Teradata |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2% | 5.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Data Warehouse | #20 | #16 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 2.5% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 14 |
| Positive in AI answers | 63% | 36% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Metabase 0pp · Teradata 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Teradata leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
MetabaseTeradata
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Metabase ranked higher
0Teradata ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Metabase | Teradata |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $100 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted or Metabase Cloud, with air-gapped deployment available on Enterprise | Cloud, on-premises and hybrid |
| Integrations | 237+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, TX-RAMP, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, IRAP PROTECTED, FedRAMP Ready at Moderate impact level on AWS |
| Support | Email, Support form, Slack, Microsoft Teams | — |
| Founded | 2014 | 1979 |
| Headquarters | — | San Diego, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series B · $43M raised | — |
| Best for | Teams that want self-service analytics without relying on engineers, and software companies that need to embed analytics in their product | — |
Plans side by side
Metabase
Open Source$0free, self-hosted, unlimited users
Starter$100month (5 users included, +$6/user/month)
Pro$575month (10 users included, +$12/user/month)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing (starts at $20,000 / year)
Teradata
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Metabase
- Free open-source edition for self-hosting
- Easy to deploy and user-friendly
- No-code visual builder and SQL for non-technical users
- Affordable, low-cost BI
- Best default starting point for startups and small teams
- Self-hosting means handling hosting, security, backups and updates yourself
- Extra token-based AI or custom usage fees on top of plans
Teradata
- Suited to large, highly regulated enterprise environments
- Mature SQL workload management and hybrid deployment options
- Strong for complex, governed enterprise workloads
- Good fit for modernizing existing Teradata environments
- High PeerSpot enterprise-warehouse rating
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Metabase vs Teradata”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/metabase-vs-teradata, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.