Skip to content
SlateIndex
MetabaseOpen source AI analytics you can verify
vs
WhatagraphThe Agentic Marketing Intelligence Platform
Comparison · Business Intelligence · weekly run Nov 2

Metabase vs Whatagraph

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Metabase is the stronger AI pick in Business Intelligence: it has a visibility score of 21.7 versus 0 for Whatagraph.

Choose Metabase if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (21.7 vs 0)
  • You need more native integrations (237+ vs 68+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (63% vs 0% positive)
  • You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage

Choose Whatagraph if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Metabase Whatagraph
Visibility score21.7%0%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Business Intelligence#5#47
Share of voice5.2%0%
Mentions this run270
Positive in AI answers63%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Metabase 22%

Metabase 0pp · Whatagraph 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Metabase leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
25.9%
0%
AI Mode
18.7%
0%
Perplexity
20.6%
0%
MetabaseWhatagraph

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Metabase ranked higher
0Whatagraph ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionMetabaseWhatagraph
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry priceFree; paid from $100 per seat / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentSelf-hosted or Metabase Cloud, with air-gapped deployment available on EnterpriseCloud-hosted
Integrations237+68+
ComplianceSOC 1, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA—
SupportEmail, Support form, Slack, Microsoft TeamsLive chat support, Dedicated Customer Success Manager on Max and Prime, Tailored onboarding on Prime, Priority support on Prime
Founded20142015
Headquarters—Amsterdam, Netherlands
Employees51–20051–200
FundingSeries B · $43M raisedSeries A
Best forTeams that want self-service analytics without relying on engineers, and software companies that need to embed analytics in their productMarketing agencies and brands that report across many client accounts or locations.

Plans side by side

Metabase

Open Source$0free, self-hosted, unlimited users
Starter$100month (5 users included, +$6/user/month)
Pro$575month (10 users included, +$12/user/month)
EnterpriseCustomcustom pricing (starts at $20,000 / year)
Metabase pricing

Whatagraph

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Metabase

  • Free open-source edition for self-hosting
  • Easy to deploy and user-friendly
  • No-code visual builder and SQL for non-technical users
  • Affordable, low-cost BI
  • Best default starting point for startups and small teams
  • Self-hosting means handling hosting, security, backups and updates yourself
  • Extra token-based AI or custom usage fees on top of plans

Whatagraph

Profile in progress.

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Metabase vs Whatagraph”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/metabase-vs-whatagraph, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.