OpenSearch vs Qdrant
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qdrant is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 60.5 versus 3.9 for OpenSearch, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose OpenSearch if…
- Strong general database popularity
- Hybrid keyword-plus-semantic search with dense vectors
- Suited to broader search, logging, analytics, and observability
Choose Qdrant if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.5 vs 3.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (68% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | OpenSearch | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.9% | 60.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #16 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.7% | 13.4% |
| Mentions this run | 8 | 63 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 68% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OpenSearch 0pp · Qdrant 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qdrant leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | OpenSearch | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a vector database for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #8 | #3 |
| How do companies store and search embeddings without a dedicated tool? | AI Mode | #5 | #2 |
| Top vector database options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #7 | #1 |
| Compare the leading Vector Databases platforms | Perplexity | #7 | #3 |
| Which Vector Databases vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #8 | #2 |
| Who makes the most used vector database? | AI Mode | #6 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OpenSearch | Qdrant |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Self-managed, or through Amazon OpenSearch Service and managed providers such as Aiven and Instaclustr. A Kubernetes operator is available for managing clusters. | Managed cloud, hybrid cloud, private cloud (air-gapped), self-hosted on-premises, and edge |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA |
| Support | Community forum, Slack, GitHub, Long-term support from certified providers | Community support via Discord on the free tier, Standard tier: email and ticket portal, 10x5 business hours, Premium tier: 24/7 support with private Slack, Discord or Teams channels, Enterprise tier: custom response SLA and advisory services |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Series B · $88M raised |
| Best for | Organizations that want search, vector retrieval, and observability on open source software without vendor lock-in. | Developers and teams building RAG, semantic search and recommendation systems that need hybrid search and metadata filtering, either self-hosted or managed |
Plans side by side
OpenSearch
Pricing not available.
Qdrant
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OpenSearch
- Strong general database popularity
- Hybrid keyword-plus-semantic search with dense vectors
- Suited to broader search, logging, analytics, and observability
Qdrant
- High performance and memory efficiency, written in Rust
- Strong metadata and complex payload filtering
- Free tier for prototyping and testing
- Open-source option with flexible self-hosting
- Strong default choice for startups and production RAG
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OpenSearch vs Qdrant”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/opensearch-vs-qdrant, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.