Skip to content
SlateIndex
OpenSearchThe open engine for AI-powered search and observability
vs
QdrantOpen-Source Vector Search Engine written in Rust
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2

OpenSearch vs Qdrant

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Qdrant is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 60.5 versus 3.9 for OpenSearch, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose OpenSearch if…

  • Strong general database popularity
  • Hybrid keyword-plus-semantic search with dense vectors
  • Suited to broader search, logging, analytics, and observability

Choose Qdrant if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.5 vs 3.9)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (68% vs 0% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric OpenSearch Qdrant
Visibility score3.9%60.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Vector Databases#16#2
Share of voice1.7%13.4%
Mentions this run863
Positive in AI answers0%68%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2OpenSearch 4%

OpenSearch 0pp · Qdrant 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Qdrant leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
3.9%
71.8%
AI Mode
3%
59.4%
Perplexity
4.8%
50.2%
OpenSearchQdrant

Head to head in AI answers

6 engine answers name both brands

0OpenSearch ranked higher
6Qdrant ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOpenSearchQdrant
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—Contact sales
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentSelf-managed, or through Amazon OpenSearch Service and managed providers such as Aiven and Instaclustr. A Kubernetes operator is available for managing clusters.Managed cloud, hybrid cloud, private cloud (air-gapped), self-hosted on-premises, and edge
Compliance—SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA
SupportCommunity forum, Slack, GitHub, Long-term support from certified providersCommunity support via Discord on the free tier, Standard tier: email and ticket portal, 10x5 business hours, Premium tier: 24/7 support with private Slack, Discord or Teams channels, Enterprise tier: custom response SLA and advisory services
Founded20212021
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CA, United StatesBerlin, Germany
Employees51–20051–200
Funding—Series B · $88M raised
Best forOrganizations that want search, vector retrieval, and observability on open source software without vendor lock-in.Developers and teams building RAG, semantic search and recommendation systems that need hybrid search and metadata filtering, either self-hosted or managed

Plans side by side

OpenSearch

Pricing not available.

Qdrant

Free Tier$0forever
Standard TierCustomusage-based
Premium TierCustomminimum spend required
Qdrant pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

OpenSearch

  • Strong general database popularity
  • Hybrid keyword-plus-semantic search with dense vectors
  • Suited to broader search, logging, analytics, and observability

    Qdrant

    • High performance and memory efficiency, written in Rust
    • Strong metadata and complex payload filtering
    • Free tier for prototyping and testing
    • Open-source option with flexible self-hosting
    • Strong default choice for startups and production RAG

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “OpenSearch vs Qdrant”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/opensearch-vs-qdrant, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.