OutSystems vs Rasa
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 2.4 for Rasa, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 2.4)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or GDPR or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
Choose Rasa if…
No clear advantage in the published data.
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OutSystems | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #32 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OutSystems 0pp · Rasa 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 1 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | OutSystems | Rasa |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is an AI agent platform and when does a company need one? | Perplexity | #4 | #1 |
| Official website of the top AI agent platform vendors | Perplexity | #20 | #17 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OutSystems | Rasa |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans | Self-managed on-premises or private cloud, or managed service |
| Integrations | 400+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) | — |
| Support | — | Free community support in the forum, Basic support via online portal with best-effort response during business hours, Premium Support with 24/7/365 response, Customer Success Manager and business reviews |
| Founded | 2001 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series F, led by KKR | Series C · $70M raised |
| Best for | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust | Product teams in regulated enterprises that want engineers and business teams to build customer-facing AI agents on one codebase |
Plans side by side
OutSystems
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Rasa
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OutSystems vs Rasa”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outsystems-vs-rasa, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.