OutSystems vs Relevance AI
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Relevance AI is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 8 versus 2.8 for OutSystems, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Relevance AI if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8 vs 2.8)
- You need more native integrations (2000+ vs 400+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 42% positive)
- You need SOC 2 coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OutSystems | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #32 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 1.5% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 10 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OutSystems 0pp · Relevance AI 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Relevance AI leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | OutSystems | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top AI agent platform vendors | Perplexity | #20 | #18 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OutSystems | Relevance AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans | — |
| Integrations | 400+ | 2000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) | SOC 2, GDPR |
| Support | — | Embedded deployment team, Dedicated account manager on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2001 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series F, led by KKR | Series A (unconfirmed, reported by Signalbase) · $37M raised |
| Best for | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust | Enterprise teams in sales, customer success, marketing and HR that want non-technical staff to build and run their own agents. |
Plans side by side
OutSystems
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Relevance AI
- visual drag-and-drop agent builder
- free tier
- prebuilt agent templates for sales, support, and operations
- hosted no-code agent builder useful for experimenting
- named best overall
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OutSystems vs Relevance AI”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outsystems-vs-relevance-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.