OutSystemsYour AI development platform built for the enterprise
vs
SimThe open-source AI workspace to build, distribute, and govern AI agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
OutSystems vs Sim
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 2.3 for Sim.
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 2.3)
- You need more native integrations (400+ vs 275+)
- You need ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Sim if…
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Technical control and model flexibility
- Self-hosting option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OutSystems | Sim |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 2.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #32 | #39 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OutSystems 0pp · Sim 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
OutSystemsSim
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0OutSystems ranked higher
0Sim ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OutSystems | Sim |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $25 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans | Cloud-hosted, or self-hosted in your own cloud with Docker or Kubernetes |
| Integrations | 400+ | 275+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | — | Dedicated support on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2001 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series F, led by KKR | Series A · $7M raised |
| Best for | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust | Companies that need to build, deploy, and govern AI agents across the organization with central control over access, spend, and data |
Plans side by side
OutSystems
OutSystems Personal Edition$0
OutSystems Agentic Systems PlatformCustomcustom quote
Sim
Free$0free forever
Pro$25per user/month, billed monthly
Max$100per user/month, billed monthly
EnterpriseCustomcustom, talk to sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Sim
- Technical control and model flexibility
- Self-hosting option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OutSystems vs Sim”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outsystems-vs-sim, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.