OutSystems vs ToolJet
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 40.2 versus 1.5 for ToolJet, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.2 vs 1.5)
- You need more native integrations (400+ vs 91+)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or HIPAA or PCI DSS or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose ToolJet if…
- You need SOC 2 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | OutSystems | ToolJet |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 40.2% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | down−2.5% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #2 | #39 |
| Share of voice | 8.2% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 47 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
OutSystems −2.3999999999999986pp · ToolJet +1.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | OutSystems | ToolJet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best low-code platform for enterprise | Perplexity | #1 | #10 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | Perplexity | #2 | #15 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | OutSystems | ToolJet |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $23 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans | ToolJet Cloud or self-hosted on the customer's own infrastructure |
| Integrations | 400+ | 91+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | — | Community support via Slack, Email, Priority email support, Dedicated support manager |
| Founded | 2001 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Boston, Massachusetts, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series F, led by KKR | Undisclosed round with M12 participation · $6M raised |
| Best for | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust | Teams building internal tools, admin panels, dashboards and approval apps over their own data |
Plans side by side
OutSystems
ToolJet
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
ToolJet
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “OutSystems vs ToolJet”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outsystems-vs-tooljet, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.