Platform.shThe software factory for AI-human workflows
vs
SemaphoreThe CI built for coding agents: fast, affordable, and enterprise-ready.
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Platform.sh vs Semaphore
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Semaphore is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 6.4 versus 0 for Platform.sh.
Choose Platform.sh if…
- You need PCI DSS Level 1 or ISO/IEC 27001 or HIPAA or FS Cloud coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Semaphore if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.4 vs 0)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 coverage
- predictable, transparent usage pricing
- free full-functionality enterprise tier for small teams and startups
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Platform.sh | Semaphore |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 6.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #43 | #14 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 1.9% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Platform.sh 0pp · Semaphore 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Semaphore leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Platform.shSemaphore
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Platform.sh ranked higher
0Semaphore ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Platform.sh | Semaphore |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $0.003 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Multi-cloud, across five clouds and 14 regions | Open source, cloud, hybrid or enterprise deployment |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, PCI DSS Level 1, ISO/IEC 27001, HIPAA, FS Cloud | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022 |
| Support | Standard support: 4-hour best effort urgent-ticket response, included by default, Advanced support: 1-hour guaranteed urgent-ticket response, Premium support: 30-minute guaranteed urgent-ticket response | Free help with account setup, projects and Git integration, Paid Basic, Priority Response, SLA Standard and SLA Premium support plans, On-demand engineering access in blocks of hours |
| Founded | 2009 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Novi Sad, Serbia |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series D · $180M raised | PE round, Cypress Ridge Capital |
| Best for | Developers, DevOps engineers and platform teams that want to move faster with AI-assisted work while keeping human approval and cost control. | Teams that want fast, low-cost CI/CD with pay-as-you-go pricing and the option to self-host open source. |
Plans side by side
Platform.sh
Pricing not available.
Semaphore
Ubuntu ARM 2vCPU$0.003minute
Ubuntu ARM 4vCPU$0.006minute
Ubuntu ARM 8vCPU$0.012minute
Ubuntu x64 2vCPU$0.008minute
Ubuntu x64 4vCPU$0.015minute
MacOS 4vCPU$0.09minute
Self-Hosted (any machine)$0.003minute
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Platform.sh
Profile in progress.
Semaphore
- predictable, transparent usage pricing
- free full-functionality enterprise tier for small teams and startups
- highest G2 review rating among CI/CD tools (4.7/5)
- low-friction integration for GitHub repositories
- scaling costs
- complex matrix requirements
- security track record concerns
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Platform.sh vs Semaphore”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/platform-sh-vs-semaphore, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.