PostgreSQL vs Redis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
PostgreSQL is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 49 versus 7.7 for Redis, and ranks ahead in 78% of the answers that name both.
Choose PostgreSQL if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (49 vs 7.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (35% vs 33% positive)
- Free open-source software
- Adds vector search to an existing PostgreSQL database without a new database
Choose Redis if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or ISO 22301 or ISO 9001 or PCI DSS or HIPAA or GDPR or CCPA or CSA STAR or VPAT or FIPS 140-3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- low-latency vector search alongside caching
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | PostgreSQL | Redis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 49% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #3 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 12.6% | 3% |
| Mentions this run | 59 | 14 |
| Positive in AI answers | 35% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
PostgreSQL 0pp · Redis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
PostgreSQL leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
9 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | PostgreSQL | Redis |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a vector database for a mid-market team? | AI Mode | #4 | #6 |
| How do companies store and search embeddings without a dedicated tool? | ChatGPT | #1 | #6 |
| How do companies store and search embeddings without a dedicated tool? | AI Mode | #3 | #6 |
| What should a vector database integrate with? | Perplexity | #1 | #2 |
| What are the best Vector Databases tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #5 | #9 |
| What are the best Vector Databases tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #6 | #9 |
| Alternatives to the most popular vector database | Perplexity | #4 | #6 |
| Official website of the top vector database vendors | ChatGPT | #10 | #7 |
| Official website of the top vector database vendors | Perplexity | #12 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | PostgreSQL | Redis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Usage-based |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $0.007 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Managed cloud service (Redis Cloud) on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, plus on-premises and hybrid deployment with Redis Software. |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, ISO 22301, ISO 9001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, CSA STAR, VPAT, FIPS 140-3 |
| Support | Community mailing lists, Community events and local user groups | Community support on the free plan, Basic support on Essentials plans, Redis support team on paid plans, Knowledge base |
| Founded | — | 2011 |
| Headquarters | United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | — | Series D |
| Best for | — | Developers and digital businesses building fast apps and real-time AI agents that need low-latency data access. |
Plans side by side
PostgreSQL
Pricing not available.
Redis
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
PostgreSQL
- Free open-source software
- Adds vector search to an existing PostgreSQL database without a new database
- Wide compatibility with drivers, BI tools, and language ecosystems
- Broad deployment and transparent self-hosted pricing
- Hosting, backups, and maintenance must be paid for when self-hosted
Redis
- low-latency vector search alongside caching
- ideal for consolidated enterprise stacks
- fits existing PostgreSQL or MongoDB stacks
- annual plans offer significant savings
- 14-day trial with up to $500 in solution-provider credits
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “PostgreSQL vs Redis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/postgresql-vs-redis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.