Skip to content
SlateIndex
PrometheusOpen source monitoring system and time series database
vs
TempoOpen-source, high-scale distributed tracing backend
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3

Prometheus vs Tempo

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Prometheus is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 20.8 versus 7.1 for Tempo, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Prometheus if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20.8 vs 7.1)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (13% vs 6% positive)
  • Open-source, standards-driven telemetry
  • Mature, widely adopted Prometheus ecosystem

Choose Tempo if…

  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or GDPR or FedRAMP High or TISAX or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
  • Open-source and cost-effective
  • Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Prometheus Tempo
Visibility score20.8%7.1%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Observability#7#12
Share of voice6.1%3.1%
Mentions this run3618
Positive in AI answers13%6%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Prometheus 21%

Prometheus 0pp · Tempo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Prometheus leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
23%
8%
AI Mode
18.3%
11.5%
Perplexity
21.1%
1.9%
PrometheusTempo

Head to head in AI answers

15 engine answers name both brands

15Prometheus ranked higher
0Tempo ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionPrometheusTempo
DeploymentSelf-hosted; the server runs as a single binary with no external dependencies.Managed as Grafana Cloud or self-hosted on Kubernetes via Helm
Compliance—SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, FedRAMP High, TISAX, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP Level 2
SupportCommunity support, Training—
Founded2012—
Headquarters—New York, NY
Employees—1,001–5,000
Funding—Series E · $1100M raised
Best forTeams monitoring cloud native and containerized applications, systems, and services—

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Prometheus

  • Open-source, standards-driven telemetry
  • Mature, widely adopted Prometheus ecosystem
  • Strong OpenTelemetry and Prometheus support
  • Low cost and flexible
  • Avoids vendor lock-in
  • Self-hosting requires setup, storage, upgrades and maintenance
  • Needs significant engineering time to scale and maintain
  • Infrastructure and maintenance costs still apply

Tempo

  • Open-source and cost-effective
  • Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
  • Distributed tracing for traces
  • Integrates smoothly with OpenTelemetry
  • Managed option with a permanent free tier
  • Demands significant internal engineering time to maintain and scale

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Prometheus vs Tempo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/prometheus-grafana-vs-tempo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.