Qdrant vs SingleStore
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qdrant is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 60.5 versus 0.6 for SingleStore, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Qdrant if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (60.5 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (68% vs 0% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- High performance and memory efficiency, written in Rust
Choose SingleStore if…
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or GDPR or CCPA or Privacy Shield or PCI DSS v4.0.1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Qdrant | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 60.5% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Vector Databases | #2 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 13.4% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 63 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 68% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qdrant 0pp · SingleStore 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qdrant leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Qdrant | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular vector database | Perplexity | #2 | #11 |
| Official website of the top vector database vendors | ChatGPT | #3 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qdrant | SingleStore |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $0.99 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Managed cloud, hybrid cloud, private cloud (air-gapped), self-hosted on-premises, and edge | Managed cloud service on AWS, Azure and Google Cloud, plus self-managed deployments and a bring-your-own-cloud option |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA | ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, Privacy Shield, PCI DSS v4.0.1 |
| Support | Community support via Discord on the free tier, Standard tier: email and ticket portal, 10x5 business hours, Premium tier: 24/7 support with private Slack, Discord or Teams channels, Enterprise tier: custom response SLA and advisory services | Self-support on the free tier, Standard Support on paid tiers, Talk to a specialist, Technical support request |
| Founded | 2021 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B · $88M raised | Series F-2 (led by Goldman Sachs) · $558M raised |
| Best for | Developers and teams building RAG, semantic search and recommendation systems that need hybrid search and metadata filtering, either self-hosted or managed | Teams building real-time applications, analytics and AI features that need live data without copies |
Plans side by side
Qdrant
SingleStore
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qdrant
- High performance and memory efficiency, written in Rust
- Strong metadata and complex payload filtering
- Free tier for prototyping and testing
- Open-source option with flexible self-hosting
- Strong default choice for startups and production RAG
SingleStore
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qdrant vs SingleStore”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qdrant-vs-singlestore, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.