QodoAI code review and governance for teams shipping AI-written code
vs
TabbyOpensource, self-hosted AI coding assistant
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Qodo vs Tabby
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qodo is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 9.4 versus 0.3 for Tabby.
Choose Qodo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.4 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Tabby if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 46% positive)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- privacy and self-hosting
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Qodo | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 9.4% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #10 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 3.2% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 15 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 46% | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Qodo 0pp · Tabby 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qodo leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
QodoTabby
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Qodo ranked higher
0Tabby ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Qodo | Tabby |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | $30 / mo | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Single-tenant SaaS or on-premises | Self-hosted on-premises or in the cloud, with no external DBMS or cloud services required |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | — |
| Support | Standard support: documentation, in-product help and ticket-based response, Priority support, dedicated SLA and assigned team member on Enterprise plans | Community Slack, Email support, Dedicated Slack channel |
| Founded | — | 2023 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY, United States | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B · $120M raised | Seed · $7M raised |
| Best for | Engineering teams shipping code at the speed AI writes it and needing consistent review and governance | Developers and teams who want a self-hosted, open-source alternative to GitHub Copilot and need to keep control of their code and infrastructure. |
Plans side by side
Tabby
Community$0per month, free open source
Team$19per seat per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Qodo
- Strong free tooling for code review, test generation, and bug detection inside the IDE
- Exceptional context-aware autocomplete and unit test generation on the free tier
- Automated test generation and pull request review that helps prevent breaking changes
- Offers a free trial, reportedly without a credit card
- Strong choice for review and testing controls in privacy and governance needs
Tabby
- privacy and self-hosting
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Qodo vs Tabby”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/qodo-vs-tabby, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.