SemaphoreThe CI built for coding agents: fast, affordable, and enterprise-ready.
vs
Travis CISimple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3
Semaphore vs Travis CI
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Semaphore is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 6.4 versus 4 for Travis CI, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Semaphore if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.4 vs 4)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (40% vs 17% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001:2022 coverage
Choose Travis CI if…
- You need GDPR or Privacy Shield coverage
- Free testing for open-source projects
- Hosted build and test service for GitHub projects
- Among the clearest CI options found
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Semaphore | Travis CI |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.4% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in CI/CD | #14 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 40% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Semaphore 0pp · Travis CI 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Semaphore leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
SemaphoreTravis CI
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Semaphore ranked higher
2Travis CI ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Semaphore | Travis CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which CI/CD tools offer annual discounts? | ChatGPT | #4 | #1 |
| Which CI/CD tools offer annual discounts? | AI Mode | #7 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Semaphore | Travis CI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $0.003 / mo | $15 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Open source, cloud, hybrid or enterprise deployment | Hosted SaaS, with an on-premise or private cloud option (Travis CI Server) |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022 | GDPR, Privacy Shield |
| Support | Free help with account setup, projects and Git integration, Paid Basic, Priority Response, SLA Standard and SLA Premium support plans, On-demand engineering access in blocks of hours | Ask Travis AI, Ticket-based support, Premium support |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Novi Sad, Serbia | Berlin, Germany |
| Employees | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Funding | PE round, Cypress Ridge Capital | — |
| Best for | Teams that want fast, low-cost CI/CD with pay-as-you-go pricing and the option to self-host open source. | Developers and small-to-midsize teams that want a minimal CI/CD configuration |
Plans side by side
Semaphore
Ubuntu ARM 2vCPU$0.003minute
Ubuntu ARM 4vCPU$0.006minute
Ubuntu ARM 8vCPU$0.012minute
Ubuntu x64 2vCPU$0.008minute
Ubuntu x64 4vCPU$0.015minute
MacOS 4vCPU$0.09minute
Self-Hosted (any machine)$0.003minute
Travis CI
Usage Based$15per month (monthly billing)
Unlimited Plan$78per month, starting price (monthly billing)
Server$34per month
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Semaphore
- predictable, transparent usage pricing
- free full-functionality enterprise tier for small teams and startups
- highest G2 review rating among CI/CD tools (4.7/5)
- low-friction integration for GitHub repositories
- scaling costs
- complex matrix requirements
- security track record concerns
Travis CI
- Free testing for open-source projects
- Hosted build and test service for GitHub projects
- Among the clearest CI options found
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Semaphore vs Travis CI”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/semaphore-vs-travis-ci, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.