SolarWinds ObservabilitySimple, powerful, secure hybrid IT observability
vs
TempoOpen-source, high-scale distributed tracing backend
Comparison · Observability · weekly run Nov 3
SolarWinds Observability vs Tempo
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tempo is the stronger AI pick in Observability: it has a visibility score of 7.1 versus 2.2 for SolarWinds Observability.
Choose SolarWinds Observability if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (17% vs 6% positive)
- broad unified monitoring across applications, servers, and networks
- strong network and infrastructure visibility
- full-stack observability for hybrid infrastructure
Choose Tempo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.1 vs 2.2)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO 22301 or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or GDPR or FedRAMP High or TISAX or CSA STAR or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- Open-source and cost-effective
- Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | SolarWinds Observability | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 7.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Observability | #24 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 3.1% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 18 |
| Positive in AI answers | 17% | 6% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
SolarWinds Observability 0pp · Tempo 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tempo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
SolarWinds ObservabilityTempo
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0SolarWinds Observability ranked higher
0Tempo ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | SolarWinds Observability | Tempo |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | $8 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | — |
| Deployment | SaaS and self-hosted, including hybrid | Managed as Grafana Cloud or self-hosted on Kubernetes via Helm |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO 22301, PCI DSS v4.0.1, GDPR, FedRAMP High, TISAX, CSA STAR, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | New York, NY |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Take-private by Turn/River Capital | Series E · $1100M raised |
| Best for | IT operations teams running hybrid and cloud-native environments | — |
Plans side by side
SolarWinds Observability
SolarWinds Observability SaaS$8per node per month
SolarWinds Observability Self-Hosted$8per node per month
Tempo
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
SolarWinds Observability
- broad unified monitoring across applications, servers, and networks
- strong network and infrastructure visibility
- full-stack observability for hybrid infrastructure
Tempo
- Open-source and cost-effective
- Mature Prometheus, Loki and Grafana ecosystem
- Distributed tracing for traces
- Integrates smoothly with OpenTelemetry
- Managed option with a permanent free tier
- Demands significant internal engineering time to maintain and scale
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “SolarWinds Observability vs Tempo”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/solarwinds-observability-vs-tempo, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.