Skip to content
SlateIndex
SupabaseBuild in a weekend. Scale to millions.
vs
WeaviateThe AI database developers love
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2

Supabase vs Weaviate

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Weaviate is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 45.2 versus 5.7 for Supabase, and ranks ahead in 90% of the answers that name both.

Choose Supabase if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($25 vs $45)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 or HIPAA (BAA available) coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

Choose Weaviate if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (45.2 vs 5.7)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (59% vs 18% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA (Enterprise Cloud on AWS) coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Supabase Weaviate
Visibility score5.7%45.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Vector Databases#12#4
Share of voice2.2%11.7%
Mentions this run1156
Positive in AI answers18%59%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Supabase 6%

Supabase 0pp · Weaviate 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Weaviate leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
10.4%
57.8%
AI Mode
5.9%
40%
Perplexity
0.9%
37.8%
SupabaseWeaviate

Head to head in AI answers

10 engine answers name both brands

1Supabase ranked higher
9Weaviate ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionSupabaseWeaviate
Pricing modelFlat tiersUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $25 / moFree; paid from $45 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentHosted cloud in AWS regions across the US, EU and Asia Pacific, or self-hosted open sourceServerless, Enterprise Cloud, or Bring Your Own Cloud
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA (BAA available)SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA (Enterprise Cloud on AWS)
SupportCommunity support (Free plan), Email support (Pro plan), Priority email support and SLAs (Team plan), 24x7 premium enterprise support and private Slack channel (Enterprise plan)Email support on all plans, Phone and Slack support on Premium and Dedicated plans, Technical Account Team add-on on Premium and Dedicated plans
Founded20202019
HeadquartersRemote-first, United StatesAmsterdam, Netherlands
Employees201–50051–200
FundingSeries D · $1000M raisedStrategic investment (Ricoh corporate venture fund)
Best forTeams building production applications on Postgres that want auth, storage, realtime and vector search in one backendDevelopment teams and enterprises building search, RAG and agent applications who want an open-source, production-ready vector database.

Plans side by side

Supabase

Free$0month
Pro$25month
Team$599month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Supabase pricing

Weaviate

Free$0month
Flex$45month minimum, pay-as-you-go
Premium SharedCustomprepaid contract (from $400/month minimum)
Premium DedicatedCustomprepaid contract
Weaviate pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Supabase

  • Integrates smoothly with Firebase and Supabase
  • Zero extra infrastructure when already running Postgres via Supabase
  • Pay nothing extra for pgvector on an existing database
  • Minimal operational overhead for existing Postgres clusters
  • Offers vector search via pgvector, with customers paying only for the database

    Weaviate

    • Strong native hybrid search
    • Open-source and modular AI-native design
    • Free tier or trial to start
    • Flexible indexing and configurable managed service
    • Published pricing with an annual-commitment option
    • Monthly minimum charges
    • Higher tiers priced steeply above entry plan

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Supabase vs Weaviate”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/supabase-vs-weaviate, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.