Skip to content
SlateIndex
turbopufferVector and full-text search built on object storage
vs
WeaviateThe AI database developers love
Comparison · Vector Databases · weekly run Nov 2

turbopuffer vs Weaviate

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Weaviate is the stronger AI pick in Vector Databases: it has a visibility score of 45.2 versus 4.6 for turbopuffer, and ranks ahead in 78% of the answers that name both.

Choose turbopuffer if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($16 vs $45)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (Business Associate Agreement available) or GDPR-ready DPA coverage
  • serverless vector and full-text search built on object storage
  • high performance at a fraction of traditional costs

Choose Weaviate if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (45.2 vs 4.6)
  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (59% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA (Enterprise Cloud on AWS) coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric turbopuffer Weaviate
Visibility score4.6%45.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Vector Databases#14#4
Share of voice1.9%11.7%
Mentions this run956
Positive in AI answers33%59%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2turbopuffer 5%

turbopuffer 0pp · Weaviate 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Weaviate leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
6.7%
57.8%
AI Mode
4.3%
40%
Perplexity
2.8%
37.8%
turbopufferWeaviate

Head to head in AI answers

9 engine answers name both brands

2turbopuffer ranked higher
7Weaviate ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionturbopufferWeaviate
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry price$16 / moFree; paid from $45 / mo
Free planNoYes
DeploymentMulti-tenant cloud on usage-based plans; single-tenant and bring-your-own-cloud (BYOC) deployments on the enterprise plan.Serverless, Enterprise Cloud, or Bring Your Own Cloud
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (Business Associate Agreement available), GDPR-ready DPASOC 2 Type II, HIPAA (Enterprise Cloud on AWS)
SupportCommunity Slack and email on all plans, Private Slack channel on higher plans, 24/7 support and 99.95% uptime SLA on enterpriseEmail support on all plans, Phone and Slack support on Premium and Dedicated plans, Technical Account Team add-on on Premium and Dedicated plans
Founded20232019
HeadquartersOttawa, Ontario, CanadaAmsterdam, Netherlands
Employees11–5051–200
FundingSeedStrategic investment (Ricoh corporate venture fund)
Best forTeams building AI applications, semantic search or recommendation systems that need large-scale vector and full-text search at lower cost.Development teams and enterprises building search, RAG and agent applications who want an open-source, production-ready vector database.

Plans side by side

turbopuffer

launch$16month minimum usage
scale$256month minimum usage
enterprise$4,096month minimum usage (>= $4,096/month, 35% usage premium)
turbopuffer pricing

Weaviate

Free$0month
Flex$45month minimum, pay-as-you-go
Premium SharedCustomprepaid contract (from $400/month minimum)
Premium DedicatedCustomprepaid contract
Weaviate pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

turbopuffer

  • serverless vector and full-text search built on object storage
  • high performance at a fraction of traditional costs
  • cloud-native, cost-conscious design
  • ranked among highest vendors in an industry ranking

    Weaviate

    • Strong native hybrid search
    • Open-source and modular AI-native design
    • Free tier or trial to start
    • Flexible indexing and configurable managed service
    • Published pricing with an annual-commitment option
    • Monthly minimum charges
    • Higher tiers priced steeply above entry plan

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “turbopuffer vs Weaviate”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/turbopuffer-vs-weaviate, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.