360Learning vs Coassemble
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
360Learning is the stronger AI pick in Learning Management: it has a visibility score of 19.2 versus 1.2 for Coassemble, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose 360Learning if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.2 vs 1.2)
- You want a lower entry price ($8 vs $2,500)
- You need GDPR or ISO 27001 or SOC 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Coassemble if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | 360Learning | Coassemble |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 19.2% | 1.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Learning Management | #5 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 6.6% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 30 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
360Learning 0pp · Coassemble 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
360Learning leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | 360Learning | Coassemble |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Learning Management System tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #5 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | 360Learning | Coassemble |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $8 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $2,500 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Hosted with US, EU, UK or AU data residency; self-hosting or dedicated servers on request |
| Compliance | GDPR, ISO 27001, SOC 2 | SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Dedicated technical support teams, Priority SLA and support, Premium onboarding and dedicated account management, Live customer webinars and knowledge base | Knowledge base, AI support, Priority support on the Scale plan, Technical support and dedicated account management on the Strategic Partner plan |
| Founded | 2013 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | New York, NY, United States | Newcastle West, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | French government grant (France 2030), amount reported inconsistently · $240M raised | Series A · $7M raised |
| Best for | Enterprise organizations that need to scale learning quickly while keeping it relevant and engaging | Engineering and product teams that want training built into their own apps, intranets and Slack |
Plans side by side
360Learning
Coassemble
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
360Learning
- Collaborative, peer-driven learning
- Subject matter experts rapidly build and share courses
- Lets employees contribute to training content
- AI-powered collaborative learning
- Strong user reviews and recommendations
Coassemble
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “360Learning vs Coassemble”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/360learning-vs-coassemble, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.