ActivepiecesAI agents, flows and 770+ apps in one workspace, open source at the core
vs
BloomreachThe AI Platform for Personalization
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Activepieces vs Bloomreach
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Bloomreach is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0 for Activepieces.
Choose Activepieces if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need more native integrations (770+ vs 175+)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Bloomreach if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 9001 or ISO 22301 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Activepieces | Bloomreach |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #40 | #27 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.7% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Activepieces 0pp · Bloomreach 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Bloomreach leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ActivepiecesBloomreach
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Activepieces ranked higher
0Bloomreach ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Activepieces | Bloomreach |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $20 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Vendor cloud (EU, Frankfurt by default), self-hosted on your own servers, or fully air-gapped | — |
| Integrations | 770+ | 175+ |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 9001, ISO 22301, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Community, AI support, Email on Team plan, Dedicated support on Ultimate plan | In-app chat with a 90-second average response, 24/7, Named Customer Success Manager, Bloomreach Academy, Monthly best-practice sessions |
| Founded | 2022 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California, US | Mountain View, California, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Seed | Series D, from Bain Capital Ventures, Battery Ventures, Lightspeed, NEA and Salesforce Ventures |
| Best for | Teams that want AI agents and automations across their business apps, with IT running the deployment and staff building the workflows | Brands at scale that send high volumes of email and SMS, run ecommerce, and hold customer data spread across systems. Most customers invest $60K or more a year. |
Plans side by side
Bloomreach
Email (ESP)Customyear, custom quote
Marketing AutomationCustomyear, custom quote
Ecommerce SearchCustomyear, custom quote
Marketing AgentCustomyear, custom quote
Shopping AgentCustomyear, custom quote
Loomi ConnectCustomyear, custom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Activepieces
Profile in progress.
Bloomreach
- included in analyst-backed marketing automation shortlist
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Activepieces vs Bloomreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/activepieces-vs-bloomreach, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.