Aider vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 7.7 versus 3.5 for Aider, and ranks ahead in 20% of the answers that name both.
Choose Aider if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 0% positive)
- Open-source, free tool
- Terminal-based AI pair programming
- Excellent Git integration
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.7 vs 3.5)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Aider | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.5% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #18 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 1.8% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Aider 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Sourcegraph Cody leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
5 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Aider | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #12 | #14 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | Perplexity | #12 | #14 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | Perplexity | #12 | #15 |
| Most affordable AI coding assistant that is still reliable | Perplexity | #6 | #7 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | Perplexity | #14 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Aider | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Terminal-based pair programmer that runs in a local git repository | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | — | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | Community-based support | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Founded | 2023 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Developers working on larger codebases who want an AI pair programmer in the terminal | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
Aider
Pricing not available.
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Aider
- Open-source, free tool
- Terminal-based AI pair programming
- Excellent Git integration
- Bring-your-own model and API key flexibility
- Self-managed setup suits strict privacy needs
- Team pays model-token API costs
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Aider vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/aider-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.