GitHub Copilot vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub Copilot is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 76.5 versus 7.7 for Sourcegraph Cody, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose GitHub Copilot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (76.5 vs 7.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 1 or ISO/IEC 27001 coverage
- Most widely used AI coding assistant
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | GitHub Copilot | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 76.5% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #1 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 14.7% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 70 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 56% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
GitHub Copilot 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub Copilot leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
14 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | GitHub Copilot | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose an AI coding assistant for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #2 | #5 |
| What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #1 | #14 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #1 | #11 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #1 | #11 |
| Which AI coding assistant has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #2 | #7 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | AI Mode | #3 | #7 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | Perplexity | #1 | #14 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | AI Mode | #1 | #7 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | Perplexity | #1 | #15 |
| Most affordable AI coding assistant that is still reliable | Perplexity | #1 | #7 |
| Which AI coding assistant offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #1 | #5 |
| Which AI coding assistant has transparent pricing? | AI Mode | #2 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | GitHub Copilot | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | Hosted cloud service; no self-hosted option found | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 1, ISO/IEC 27001 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | — | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | — | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
GitHub Copilot
Pricing not available.
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
GitHub Copilot
- Most widely used AI coding assistant
- Strong integrated editor completion and multi-file agent workflows across VS Code, JetBrains and GitHub
- Strong enterprise default with broad integration, governance and compliance
- Affordable, reliable choice at about $10 per month
- Free tier available for testing
- Usage-based credit system makes heavy agent use hard to predict
- Enterprise tiers require an underlying GitHub Enterprise account, raising effective cost
- Free tier allowance is limited
- Reportedly no longer offers annual billing after June 2026
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “GitHub Copilot vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/copilot-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.