Amazon Q Developer vs Sourcegraph Cody
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Amazon Q Developer is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 10.1 versus 7.7 for Sourcegraph Cody, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Amazon Q Developer if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.1 vs 7.7)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO certifications (listed as in-scope AWS service) coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Free trial available for 30 days
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Amazon Q Developer | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 10.1% | 7.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #8 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 4.2% | 3.3% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 16 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Amazon Q Developer 0pp · Sourcegraph Cody 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Amazon Q Developer leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
8 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Amazon Q Developer | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose an AI coding assistant for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #3 | #5 |
| What are the best AI coding assistant tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #6 | #14 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | ChatGPT | #5 | #11 |
| Top AI coding assistant options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #5 | #11 |
| Compare the leading AI coding assistant platforms | Perplexity | #5 | #14 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | AI Mode | #5 | #7 |
| Alternatives to the most popular AI coding assistant | Perplexity | #7 | #15 |
| Official website of the top AI coding assistant vendors | Perplexity | #8 | #12 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Amazon Q Developer | Sourcegraph Cody |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $16,000 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Deployment | IDEs, the CLI, the AWS console, GitLab and Microsoft Teams | Single-tenant cloud, self-hosted, or bring-your-own cloud for air-gapped environments |
| Compliance | ISO certifications (listed as in-scope AWS service) | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001 |
| Support | — | 24×5 support, Customer success manager, Optional premium support |
| Headquarters | Seattle, Washington | San Francisco, California, US |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Later-stage deal · $225M raised |
| Best for | Teams working mainly on AWS | Enterprise engineering teams working on large, complex codebases |
Plans side by side
Amazon Q Developer
Pricing not available.
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Amazon Q Developer
- Deep AWS ecosystem integration
- Highly rated by enterprise users for cloud-integrated development
- Infrastructure-as-code assistance
- Native deployment documentation and cloud integration
- Capable, good AI coding assistant
Sourcegraph Cody
- Free trial available for 30 days
- Pricing lacks transparency for small teams due to reliance on custom sales quotes
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Amazon Q Developer vs Sourcegraph Cody”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/amazon-q-developer-vs-sourcegraph-cody, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.