AnacondaBuild, secure, and operate AI on the models and infrastructure you choose.
vs
HopsworksThe AI Lakehouse for Real-Time ML
Comparison · MLOps Platforms · weekly run Nov 2
Anaconda vs Hopsworks
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Anaconda is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 5.1 versus 0.3 for Hopsworks.
Choose Anaconda if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.1 vs 0.3)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 2 Type 2 or PCI DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Hopsworks if…
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Anaconda | Hopsworks |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.1% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #19 | #52 |
| Share of voice | 1.7% | 0.1% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Anaconda 0pp · Hopsworks 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Anaconda leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AnacondaHopsworks
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Anaconda ranked higher
0Hopsworks ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Anaconda | Hopsworks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Managed cloud, self-hosted cloud, or on-premises. AI Artifacts are also available for air-gapped networks. | Fully managed SaaS, self-hosted on Kubernetes, on-premises, air-gapped and hybrid |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, PCI DSS, GDPR | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | Community support, Priority support, Dedicated support with SLA commitments, Dedicated Slack/Teams channel | Community support, Dedicated support team and custom integrations on Enterprise plan, Platform SLA on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2012 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series C | Series B |
| Best for | Enterprises and builders that want to build, secure and run AI on their own models, tools and infrastructure, including regulated industries. | Teams building production ML systems that need real-time feature serving and reuse of features across models |
Plans side by side
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Anaconda vs Hopsworks”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/anaconda-vs-hopsworks, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.