Skip to content
SlateIndex
AppcastBetter Hiring Outcomes. Less Wasted Spend.
vs
Ceipal ATSUnified Talent Platform for Hiring, Vendors & Workforce
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Appcast vs Ceipal ATS

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Ceipal ATS is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 1.4 versus 0 for Appcast.

Choose Appcast if…

  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

Choose Ceipal ATS if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.4 vs 0)
  • You need SOC 2 coverage

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Appcast Ceipal ATS
Visibility score0%1.4%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#71#50
Share of voice0%0.3%
Mentions this run02
Positive in AI answers—50%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Appcast 0%

Appcast 0pp · Ceipal ATS 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Ceipal ATS leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
4.1%
AI Mode
0%
0%
Perplexity
0%
0%
AppcastCeipal ATS

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Appcast ranked higher
0Ceipal ATS ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAppcastCeipal ATS
Compliance—SOC 2
SupportHands-on strategic partnership, Recruitment marketing experts who work as an extension of your teamDedicated support
Founded—2015
HeadquartersLebanon, NH, United StatesRochester, NY
Employees501–1,000201–500
FundingSeries BSeries B
Best forTalent acquisition leaders across all industries, including global hiring organizationsHealthcare staffing firms, IT and general staffing firms, and enterprise recruiting teams

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appcast vs Ceipal ATS”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appcast-vs-ceipal-ats, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.