Skip to content
SlateIndex
AppcastBetter Hiring Outcomes. Less Wasted Spend.
vs
HiredRecruiting
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Appcast vs Hired

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0 for Appcast.

Choose Appcast if…

No clear advantage in the published data.

Choose Hired if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0)
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Appcast Hired
Visibility score0%3.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#71#25
Share of voice0%0.7%
Mentions this run03
Positive in AI answers—0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Appcast 0%

Appcast 0pp · Hired 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Hired leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
0%
AI Mode
0%
6.3%
Perplexity
0%
3.7%
AppcastHired

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Appcast ranked higher
0Hired ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAppcastHired
SupportHands-on strategic partnership, Recruitment marketing experts who work as an extension of your team—
HeadquartersLebanon, NH, United StatesJacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH)
Employees501–1,0005,000+
FundingSeries BSeries D · $133M raised
Best forTalent acquisition leaders across all industries, including global hiring organizationsEmployers hiring tech and sales talent

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appcast vs Hired”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appcast-vs-hired, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.