Hired alternatives: top competitors compared
Named alongside Hired
GreenhouseBest forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises67% of Hired answersLinkedInBest forRecruiters and hiring teams who need to source professional candidates67% of Hired answersWorkday67% of Hired answersIndeedBest forSmall to large companies hiring67% of Hired answers
Data from SlateIndex weekly runs
Hired has a visibility score of 3.3 in Recruiting, #25 of 83. AI answers that name Hired most often also name these 4.
Quick reference
| Alternative | Best for | Starting price | Visibility | Key differentiator |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse | Employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises | Contact sales | 38.5% | Connects employers and job seekers in one hiring ecosystem, so sourcing, interviewing and the ATS share the same signal |
| Recruiters and hiring teams who need to source professional candidates | — | 19.1% | Size of the candidate database is cited as the main differentiator | |
| Workday | — | — | 18.3% | — |
| Indeed | Small to large companies hiring | — | 13.7% | — |
Alternative 1
Greenhouse vs Hired →Greenhouse
Greenhouse suits employers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprises.
Quick facts
- Contact sales · flat tiers
- 38.5% visibility score · #1 in Recruiting
Key features
- Greenhouse Sourcing — Surfaces job seekers from MyGreenhouse and prospect pools when a role opens.
- Greenhouse Real Talent — Flags fraud, spam and misrepresentation, verifies candidates and ranks best-fit applicants.
- Greenhouse Voice AI — Two-way, voice-based first interview on the candidate's schedule, using the team's own questions and rubric.
- Greenhouse Notetaker — Records, transcribes and summarizes interviews and maps notes to scorecard questions.
Greenhouse vs Hired
| Dimension | Greenhouse | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 38.5% | 3.3% |
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Contact sales | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
- Strong reporting and data visibility
- Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
- Integration ecosystem and unified data
- Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance
Cons
Alternative 2LinkedIn
LinkedIn vs Hired →LinkedIn suits recruiters and hiring teams who need to source professional candidates.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 19.1% visibility score · #5 in Recruiting
Key features
- LinkedIn Recruiter — Candidate sourcing and pipeline tool with advanced filters, Boolean search and recommended matches.
- LinkedIn Recruiter Lite — Lower-volume tier with 30 InMail messages per month and more than 20 filters.
LinkedIn vs Hired
| Dimension | Hired | |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 19.1% | 3.3% |
| Pricing model | — | — |
| Entry price | — | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Industry-standard candidate sourcing and networking reach
- Chrome extension imports candidates directly from LinkedIn
- One-click job posting to LinkedIn and other boards
Cons
- Basic LinkedIn integration and permission settings can feel restrictive
- Integrations may not work seamlessly in practice
Alternative 3
Workday vs Hired →Workday
Workday is ranked #6 in Recruiting.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 18.3% visibility score · #6 in Recruiting
Key features
- Workday Expense Management — Employee expense reporting unified with Workday Financial Management and HCM, with receipt scanning, spend authorizations and freezes.
Workday vs Hired
| Dimension | Workday | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 18.3% | 3.3% |
| Pricing model | — | — |
| Entry price | — | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Strong for large enterprise HCM and workforce management
- Seamless integration within broader HR and finance ecosystem
- Deep analytics and enterprise core
- Fast out-of-the-box integrations with standard systems
Cons
Alternative 4
Indeed vs Hired →Indeed
Indeed suits small to large companies hiring.
Quick facts
- Pricing not available
- 13.7% visibility score · #12 in Recruiting
Key features
- Indeed for Employers — Cloud-based hiring platform with candidate-stage tracking, dashboards, assessments and ATS integrations.
- Talent Scout — AI agent for employers.
- Premium Sponsored Jobs — Pay-per-click sponsored job postings with daily or total spend limits.
- Indeed Connect — Subscription bundle with early access to tools such as Advanced Sourcing and Smart Screening.
Indeed vs Hired
| Dimension | Indeed | Hired |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 13.7% | 3.3% |
| Pricing model | — | — |
| Entry price | — | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Trial | — | — |
Pros
- Largest global job site with broad reach
- Free or sponsored job postings
- Free built-in ATS dashboard for direct postings
- Multi-board job distribution and applicant pull-in
- Chrome extension to import candidates
Cons
How to choose
Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.
| Platform | Pricing model | Starting price |
|---|---|---|
| Hired | — | — |
| Greenhouse | Flat tiers | Contact sales |
| — | — | |
| Workday | — | — |
| Indeed | — | — |
More alternatives
Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Hired in the latest weekly run.