Skip to content
SlateIndex
AppfarmBuild custom software without becoming a software company.
vs
UiPathBusiness orchestration and automation for AI agents, robots, and people
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3

Appfarm vs UiPath

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Appfarm is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 4.6 versus 2.4 for UiPath.

Choose Appfarm if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.6 vs 2.4)
  • You need ISO 27001 coverage
  • Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes

Choose UiPath if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 0% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Appfarm UiPath
Visibility score4.6%2.4%
Change vs last weekdown−0.7%up+1.8%
Rank in Low-Code & No-Code#23#33
Share of voice1.9%0.6%
Mentions this run114
Positive in AI answers0%38%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Appfarm 5%

Appfarm −0.8000000000000007pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Appfarm leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
4.6%
AI Mode
2.8%
0%
Perplexity
10.2%
2.6%
AppfarmUiPath

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Appfarm ranked higher
0UiPath ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAppfarmUiPath
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—Free; paid from $25 / mo
Free plan—Yes
DeploymentManaged cloudCloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped
ComplianceISO 27001SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5
SupportCommunity, Email, Service managerBronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum
Founded20182005
HeadquartersOslo, NorwayNew York City, NY, United States
Employees51–2001,001–5,000
FundingCapital increase led by Idékapital, with Eviny Ventures and Arkwright X · $6M raisedIPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised
Best forOperations teams that need governed operational apps without a dedicated development teamLarge enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform

Plans side by side

Appfarm

Pricing not available.

UiPath

Community$0free forever
Basic$25per month (starting at)
StandardCustomcontact sales
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
UiPath pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Appfarm

  • Suited to operational applications and customer-facing prototypes

    UiPath

    • Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
    • Fast implementation times compared with peers
    • Rated Exemplary by ISG
    • Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
    • Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appfarm vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appfarm-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.