ServiceNow vs UiPath
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
ServiceNow is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 8.7 versus 2.4 for UiPath, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose ServiceNow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.7 vs 2.4)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27701 or ISO 9001 or ISO 22301 or ISO/IEC 42001 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High P-ATO coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Dominant enterprise leader in IT service management
Choose UiPath if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (38% vs 36% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO 9001:2015 or HITRUST or HIPAA or C5 coverage
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ServiceNow | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 8.7% | 2.4% |
| Change vs last week | up+1% | up+1.8% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #12 | #33 |
| Share of voice | 2.4% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 15 | 4 |
| Positive in AI answers | 36% | 38% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ServiceNow +0.9999999999999991pp · UiPath +1.7999999999999998pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
ServiceNow leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | ServiceNow | UiPath |
|---|---|---|---|
| How long does it take to roll out a low-code platform? | ChatGPT | #3 | #1 |
| Which Low-Code & No-Code vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #6 | #9 |
| Official website of the top low-code platform vendors | ChatGPT | #6 | #14 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ServiceNow | UiPath |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud (Automation Cloud, with regional or dedicated options) or self-hosted on premises, including air-gapped |
| Compliance | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO/IEC 27701, ISO 9001, ISO 22301, ISO/IEC 42001, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High P-ATO | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, ISO 9001:2015, HITRUST, HIPAA, C5 |
| Support | — | Bronze Support (Basic tier), UiPath Community Forum |
| Founded | 2004 | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, CA | New York City, NY, United States |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | IPO | IPO (NYSE: PATH) · $1970M raised |
| Best for | — | Large enterprises and regulated industries that need agents, robots, and people governed on one platform |
Plans side by side
ServiceNow
Pricing not available.
UiPath
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ServiceNow
- Dominant enterprise leader in IT service management
- Strong workflow automation and low-code app development
- Connects customer service, IT and field operations
- Strong out-of-the-box integrations with major CRMs
- Ranked highly by analysts and G2
- Long implementation times
UiPath
- Excellent for enterprise agentic automation blending RPA with AI decision-making
- Fast implementation times compared with peers
- Rated Exemplary by ISG
- Strong for workflow automation, RPA, and complex business processes
- Good for automating operational processes across multiple applications
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ServiceNow vs UiPath”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/servicenow-vs-uipath, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.