Appian vs OutSystems
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
OutSystems is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 40.2 versus 19.6 for Appian, and ranks ahead in 91% of the answers that name both.
Choose Appian if…
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or SOC 3 or FedRAMP Moderate or FedRAMP High or DISA IL5 provisional authorization coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
Choose OutSystems if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.2 vs 19.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (42% vs 38% positive)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 22301 or FedRAMP Authorized or GDPR or ENS (Spain) or ACN (Italy) or DESC (UAE) coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Appian | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 19.6% | 40.2% |
| Change vs last week | down−1% | down−2.5% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #6 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 5.4% | 8.2% |
| Mentions this run | 31 | 47 |
| Positive in AI answers | 38% | 42% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Appian −1pp · OutSystems −2.3999999999999986pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
OutSystems leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
33 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Appian | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|---|
| What is a low-code platform and when does a company need one? | ChatGPT | #4 | #2 |
| How do I choose a low-code platform for a mid-market team? | ChatGPT | #5 | #3 |
| What features matter most in a low-code platform? | ChatGPT | #5 | #4 |
| What is the difference between a low-code platform and a traditional application framework? | ChatGPT | #4 | #2 |
| What are the best Low-Code & No-Code tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #7 | #4 |
| Top low-code platform options for B2B SaaS companies | Perplexity | #7 | #4 |
| Best low-code platform for enterprise | ChatGPT | #4 | #1 |
| Best low-code platform for enterprise | AI Mode | #1 | #4 |
| Best low-code platform for enterprise | Perplexity | #4 | #1 |
| Which low-code platform has the best reviews? | ChatGPT | #3 | #1 |
| Which low-code platform has the best reviews? | AI Mode | #3 | #1 |
| Which low-code platform has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #4 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Appian | OutSystems |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Appian Cloud, with a separate Government Cloud for federal customers, plus self-managed and hybrid options | Cloud, hybrid and sovereign cloud deployment, with a self-hosted on-premises option in certain plans |
| Integrations | — | 400+ |
| Compliance | SOC 1, SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Moderate, FedRAMP High, DISA IL5 provisional authorization | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 22301, FedRAMP Authorized, HIPAA, PCI DSS, GDPR, ENS (Spain), ACN (Italy), DESC (UAE) |
| Support | Appian Customer Success program, Appian Guarantee for first app delivery in 8 weeks or less | — |
| Founded | 1999 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | McLean, Virginia | Boston, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | IPO on Nasdaq (APPN) at $12 per share · $85M raised | Series F, led by KKR |
| Best for | Large enterprises and government bodies running complex, document-intensive, high-volume processes that depend on operational context | Regulated enterprises that need to modernize legacy systems and run custom apps and agents they can trust |
Plans side by side
Appian
OutSystems
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Appian
- heavy-duty workflow automation and process orchestration
- strong case management
- suited to regulated industries
- governed platform for AI agents
- free Community Edition for evaluation
- quote-based, less transparent pricing
OutSystems
- Enterprise-grade scalability for complex, mission-critical applications
- High performance and speed in app delivery
- Strong analyst rankings as an enterprise low-code leader
- Full-stack web and mobile app development with omnichannel reach
- Modernizing legacy systems and deep integrations
- Quote-based, opaque enterprise pricing
- High cost for enterprise tiers
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Appian vs OutSystems”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appian-vs-outsystems, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.