AppSheetBuild apps with no code
vs
Bolt.newBuild stunning apps & websites, just by prompting.
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
AppSheet vs Bolt.new
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
AppSheet is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 6.7 versus 0.3 for Bolt.new.
Choose AppSheet if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.7 vs 0.3)
- You want a lower entry price ($5 vs $25)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or HIPAA (supports customers' compliance) or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Bolt.new if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Best for rapid prototyping and validating ideas
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | AppSheet | Bolt.new |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 6.7% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.5% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #14 | #43 |
| Share of voice | 1.9% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 11 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 26% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AppSheet +1.5pp · Bolt.new +0.3pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
AppSheet leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AppSheetBolt.new
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0AppSheet ranked higher
0Bolt.new ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AppSheet | Bolt.new |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $25 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud, browser-based on Google Cloud Platform | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, HIPAA (supports customers' compliance), GDPR, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR |
| Support | AppSheet community, Help articles and documentation, Email support (Core plan), Priority support (Enterprise Plus plan) | Community, Email, Priority support on Pro and Teams, 24/7 priority support on Enterprise |
| Founded | — | 2017 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A led by Shasta Ventures with New Enterprise Associates | Series B · $135M raised |
| Best for | Businesses and teams that want internal apps and automations built without coding, especially those using Google Workspace. | Entrepreneurs, small businesses, product managers, marketers, agencies and students who want to build apps or websites by prompting |
Plans side by side
AppSheet
Starter$5user/month
Core$10user/month
Enterprise Plus$20user/month
Publisher Pro$50app/month
Bolt.new
Free$0month
Pro$25month
Teams$30per member per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual contract
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AppSheet
- Good for non-technical, spreadsheet-driven apps
- Affordable low-code option
- Works well for field apps and offline mobile workflows
- Suits organisations on Google Workspace
- Connects apps to existing business systems
- Overkill for simple apps or straightforward internal workflows
Bolt.new
- Best for rapid prototyping and validating ideas
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AppSheet vs Bolt.new”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/appsheet-vs-bolt-new, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.