ArizeThe agent observability and evaluation platform.
vs
ClearMLThe Infrastructure Platform For AI Builders
Comparison · MLOps Platforms · weekly run Nov 2
Arize vs ClearML
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
ClearML is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 20.6 versus 1.5 for Arize, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.
Choose Arize if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or PCI DSS or HIPAA or GDPR coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose ClearML if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (20.6 vs 1.5)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $50)
- AI answers describe it more positively (43% vs 20% positive)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Arize | ClearML |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 20.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #34 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 4.5% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 30 |
| Positive in AI answers | 20% | 43% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Arize 0pp · ClearML 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
ClearML leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ArizeClearML
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
1Arize ranked higher
1ClearML ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Arize | ClearML |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular MLOps platform | Perplexity | #20 | #3 |
| Best MLOps platform with AI features | ChatGPT | #12 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Arize | ClearML |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $50 / mo | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | SaaS, with self-hosted deployment on the Enterprise plan; Phoenix runs locally or self-hosted. | Hosted servers, self-hosted, or a managed service in a VPC, on-premises (including air-gapped) or hybrid. |
| Integrations | 40+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA, GDPR | — |
| Support | Community, Email, Dedicated support on Enterprise | Dedicated Slack channel (Scale), Standard SLA (Scale), White-glove support with custom SLA (Enterprise), Professional services (Enterprise) |
| Founded | 2020 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | — | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Employees | 51–200 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B-1 extension · $131M raised | Series B (reported for parent Allegro AI, unverified, led by New Enterprise Associates) · $16M raised |
| Best for | AI engineering teams building and running production AI agents and LLM applications who need observability and evaluations. | Individuals, researchers and small teams on the free plan, growing AI teams on Pro, and enterprises running GPU clusters for multiple large projects. |
Plans side by side
ClearML
Community$0month
Pro$15user/month + usage
ScaleCustomcustom quote
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Arize
Profile in progress.
ClearML
- open-source flexibility
- transparent, clear pricing with a free self-hosted tier
- end-to-end MLOps coverage in one platform
- GPU orchestration and pipeline automation
- affordable choice for cost-conscious teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Arize vs ClearML”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/arize-vs-clearml, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.