Arthur AIAI governance for everyone
vs
HopsworksThe AI Lakehouse for Real-Time ML
Comparison · MLOps Platforms · weekly run Nov 2
Arthur AI vs Hopsworks
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Hopsworks is the stronger AI pick in MLOps Platforms: it has a visibility score of 0.3 versus 0 for Arthur AI.
Choose Arthur AI if…
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Hopsworks if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.3 vs 0)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or GDPR or HIPAA coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Arthur AI | Hopsworks |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 0.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in MLOps Platforms | #58 | #52 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 0.1% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Arthur AI 0pp · Hopsworks 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Hopsworks leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Arthur AIHopsworks
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Arthur AI ranked higher
0Hopsworks ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Arthur AI | Hopsworks |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $60 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Multi-tenant SaaS, single-tenant SaaS, dedicated or managed VPC, self-managed, cloud or on-prem | Fully managed SaaS, self-hosted on Kubernetes, on-premises, air-gapped and hybrid |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA |
| Support | Community and email support, Dedicated customer success manager (Enterprise), Dedicated channel, Uptime SLA | Community support, Dedicated support team and custom integrations on Enterprise plan, Platform SLA on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York City, New York, United States | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Employees | 11–50 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series B · $60M raised | Series B |
| Best for | Enterprise security, audit, governance, engineering and product teams that need to find, control and ship AI agents and models | Teams building production ML systems that need real-time feature serving and reuse of features across models |
Plans side by side
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Arthur AI vs Hopsworks”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/arthur-ai-vs-hopsworks, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.