Atlassian Confluence vs GitHub
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
GitHub is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 10.2 versus 3.1 for Atlassian Confluence, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose Atlassian Confluence if…
- You need SOC 2 or SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Industry standard for large-scale enterprise documentation and wikis
- Deep integration with Jira and the Atlassian ecosystem
Choose GitHub if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.2 vs 3.1)
- AI answers describe it more positively (48% vs 42% positive)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or CSA STAR Level 2 or FedRAMP Tailored ATO coverage
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Atlassian Confluence | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.1% | 10.2% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #25 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 2.6% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 42% | 48% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Atlassian Confluence 0pp · GitHub 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
GitHub leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Atlassian Confluence | GitHub |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | ChatGPT | #9 | #2 |
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | AI Mode | #1 | #3 |
| Compare the leading Project Management platforms | AI Mode | #7 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Atlassian Confluence | GitHub |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Free; paid from $4 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS, hosted by Atlassian) and self-hosted Data Center. Confluence Server reached end of support on 15 February 2024. | Cloud service (GitHub.com and GitHub Enterprise Cloud) and self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server |
| Compliance | SOC 2, SOC 3, PCI DSS, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, CSA STAR Level 2, PCI DSS, FedRAMP Tailored ATO |
| Support | — | Community support (Free plan), Web-based support (Team plan), Premium support with 24/7 web and phone support and a 30-minute SLA on urgent tickets (Enterprise) |
| Founded | — | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | San Francisco, California |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Grant | Round led by Sequoia Capital · $350M raised |
| Best for | — | Development teams, from individuals to enterprises, that build, review, and ship software on one platform. |
Plans side by side
Atlassian Confluence
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Atlassian Confluence
- Industry standard for large-scale enterprise documentation and wikis
- Deep integration with Jira and the Atlassian ecosystem
- Strong fit for engineering and technical teams
- Free plan supports up to 10 users
- Savings of up to 17% when billed annually
GitHub
- Most widely adopted CI/CD tool today
- Native integration with GitHub repositories and pull requests
- Transparent pricing with a generous free tier
- Best default for teams already using GitHub
- High user satisfaction and review scores
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Atlassian Confluence vs GitHub”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/atlassian-confluence-vs-github, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.