Skip to content
SlateIndex
Augment CodeAgentic software development at organizational scale
vs
ClaudeAI Coding Assistants
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3

Augment Code vs Claude

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Claude is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 47.5 versus 2.2 for Augment Code, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.

Choose Augment Code if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 53% positive)
  • You need ISO/IEC 42001 coverage
  • Suited to very large or legacy repositories
  • Named as a contender in the field

Choose Claude if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (47.5 vs 2.2)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need SOC 2 Type I or ISO 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or HIPAA coverage
  • Strong deep reasoning and architectural understanding

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Augment Code Claude
Visibility score2.2%47.5%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in AI Coding Assistants#20#3
Share of voice0.8%11%
Mentions this run454
Positive in AI answers100%53%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Augment Code 2%

Augment Code 0pp · Claude 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Claude leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
62%
AI Mode
0%
36.7%
Perplexity
5.7%
43.7%
Augment CodeClaude

Head to head in AI answers

4 engine answers name both brands

1Augment Code ranked higher
3Claude ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAugment CodeClaude
Pricing modelFlat tiers—
Entry price$20 / mo—
Free planNo—
DeploymentManaged cloud sandboxes, your own machines, or pools of bothClaude Code can be deployed through Amazon Bedrock, Google Cloud and Microsoft Foundry, and self-hosted sessions run on the customer's own infrastructure.
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001SOC 2 Type I, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, HIPAA
SupportCommunity support and tickets via support portal (Standard, Business), Dedicated support with full SLA (Enterprise)—
Founded2022—
HeadquartersPalo Alto, California, United StatesSan Francisco, California
Employees51–200—
FundingSeries B · $252M raisedSeries G
Best forEnterprises and engineering organizations running agent workflows across the software development lifecycle, from startups to the Fortune 500—

Plans side by side

Augment Code

Standard$20month flat, no per-seat charge
Business$100month flat, no per-seat charge
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Augment Code pricing

Claude

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Augment Code

  • Suited to very large or legacy repositories
  • Named as a contender in the field

    Claude

    • Strong deep reasoning and architectural understanding
    • Handles complex multi-file work and large codebases
    • Effective autonomous agentic coding in terminal workflows
    • Transparent, clearly named paid tiers
    • Widely adopted among developers

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Augment Code vs Claude”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/augment-code-vs-claude, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.