Augment Code vs Cursor
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Cursor is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 67.7 versus 2.2 for Augment Code, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Augment Code if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 53% positive)
- You need ISO/IEC 42001 coverage
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Choose Cursor if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (67.7 vs 2.2)
- You need AIUC-1 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Augment Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.2% | 67.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #20 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.8% | 13.6% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 65 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 53% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Augment Code 0pp · Cursor 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Cursor leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Augment Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which AI coding assistant has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #6 | #1 |
| Which AI coding assistant vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #11 | #2 |
| What are the pros and cons of Aider? | AI Mode | #5 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Augment Code | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | $20 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Managed cloud sandboxes, your own machines, or pools of both | Desktop, CLI, web, mobile and cloud agents |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001 | AIUC-1, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type II |
| Support | Community support and tickets via support portal (Standard, Business), Dedicated support with full SLA (Enterprise) | Customer support by email at hi@cursor.com, Priority support on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2022 | — |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, United States | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series B · $252M raised | Funding round at $9.9B valuation |
| Best for | Enterprises and engineering organizations running agent workflows across the software development lifecycle, from startups to the Fortune 500 | Individual developers and engineering teams that hand coding tasks to AI agents, and larger organizations that need enterprise security and admin controls. |
Plans side by side
Augment Code
Cursor
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Augment Code
- Suited to very large or legacy repositories
- Named as a contender in the field
Cursor
- Strong codebase indexing and multi-file editing
- High user satisfaction and momentum
- Top overall pick for professional developers
- Transparent pricing tiers and annual discount
- Free tier to try it
- Shared credit pool makes heavy agentic usage less predictable
- Free Hobby plan has limited usage
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Augment Code vs Cursor”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/augment-code-vs-cursor, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.