Bolt.newBuild stunning apps & websites, just by prompting.
vs
Kilo CodeOpen source AI coding agent in IDE, CLI and Cloud
Comparison · AI Coding Assistants · weekly run Nov 3
Bolt.new vs Kilo Code
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Kilo Code is the stronger AI pick in AI Coding Assistants: it has a visibility score of 5.3 versus 0 for Bolt.new.
Choose Bolt.new if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or GDPR coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Best for rapid prototyping and validating ideas
Choose Kilo Code if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.3 vs 0)
- You want a lower entry price ($15 vs $25)
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Bolt.new | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0% | 5.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Coding Assistants | #38 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 0% | 1.1% |
| Mentions this run | 0 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 100% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bolt.new 0pp · Kilo Code 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Kilo Code leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Bolt.newKilo Code
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Bolt.new ranked higher
0Kilo Code ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bolt.new | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $25 / mo | Free; paid from $15 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | IDE, CLI and cloud; local models supported; the open-source code can be self-hosted |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR | — |
| Support | Community, Email, Priority support on Pro and Teams, 24/7 priority support on Enterprise | Community support on the Individual plan, Priority support on the Teams plan, Dedicated support channels and SLA commitments on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2017 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | — |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Series B · $135M raised | Seed · $8M raised |
| Best for | Entrepreneurs, small businesses, product managers, marketers, agencies and students who want to build apps or websites by prompting | Developers and teams who want an open-source AI coding agent that works with their own model keys or local models across IDE, CLI and cloud. |
Plans side by side
Bolt.new
Free$0month
Pro$25month
Teams$30per member per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom annual contract
Kilo Code
Free$0free for individuals; usage billed separately
Teams$15user/month
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bolt.new
- Best for rapid prototyping and validating ideas
Kilo Code
- Useful AI coding agent inside the IDE
- Low subscription costs and no vendor lock-in
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bolt.new vs Kilo Code”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bolt-new-vs-kilo-code, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.