Skip to content
SlateIndex
BuildkiteYou deserve better CI
vs
CodemagicOne tool for all your mobile app builds.
Comparison · CI/CD · weekly run Nov 3

Buildkite vs Codemagic

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Buildkite is the stronger AI pick in CI/CD: it has a visibility score of 19.5 versus 0.9 for Codemagic, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.

Choose Buildkite if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (19.5 vs 0.9)
  • You want a lower entry price ($30 vs $3,990)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (32% vs 0% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage

Choose Codemagic if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Buildkite Codemagic
Visibility score19.5%0.9%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in CI/CD#5#28
Share of voice6%0.2%
Mentions this run371
Positive in AI answers32%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Buildkite 20%

Buildkite 0pp · Codemagic 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Buildkite leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
30.2%
0%
AI Mode
8.7%
0%
Perplexity
19.6%
2.6%
BuildkiteCodemagic

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Buildkite ranked higher
1Codemagic ranked higher
PromptEngineBuildkiteCodemagic
Which CI/CD tools offer annual discounts? Perplexity#8#3

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionBuildkiteCodemagic
Pricing modelPer seatUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $30 per seat / moFree; paid from $3,990 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentHybrid: the control plane is hosted in AWS, and agents run on customer infrastructure or on Buildkite hosted agentsCloud-hosted and fully maintained; dedicated servers optional, hosted in your region
ComplianceSOC 2 Type IISOC 2 Type 2
SupportCommunity support on the Free plan, Priority email support on the Pro plan, Enterprise support with SLA credits, priority response times and Slack Connect on the Enterprise planCommunity support, Technical support, Priority support (enterprise), Free onboarding assistance
Founded20132012
HeadquartersMelbourne, AustraliaLondon, United Kingdom
Employees51–20011–50
FundingConvertible noteSeed
Best forEngineering teams that want CI to run on their own infrastructure and need it to scale to large build volumesTeams building Flutter, React Native, native Android and iOS apps who want hosted mobile CI/CD.

Plans side by side

Buildkite

Free Plan$0
Pro Plan$30active user/month
Enterprise PlanCustom
Buildkite pricing

Codemagic

Free$0month
Pay as you go$0month
Fixed price$3,990year
Enterprise$12,000year
Codemagic pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Buildkite

  • Scalable hybrid CI/CD infrastructure with secure agent execution
  • Control over build infrastructure while using hosted pipeline management
  • Suited to large teams with heavy workloads, monorepos, and high parallelism
  • Straightforward pricing
  • High-performance managed CI

    Codemagic

    Profile in progress.

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Buildkite vs Codemagic”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/buildkite-vs-codemagic, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.