Skip to content
SlateIndex
CareerBuilderRecruiting
vs
HiredRecruiting
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

CareerBuilder vs Hired

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Hired is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 1.5 for CareerBuilder.

Choose CareerBuilder if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 0% positive)
  • multi-channel job distribution

Choose Hired if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 1.5)
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric CareerBuilder Hired
Visibility score1.5%3.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#45#25
Share of voice0.4%0.7%
Mentions this run23
Positive in AI answers50%0%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3CareerBuilder 2%

CareerBuilder 0pp · Hired 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Hired leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
0%
AI Mode
2.6%
6.3%
Perplexity
2%
3.7%
CareerBuilderHired

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0CareerBuilder ranked higher
0Hired ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCareerBuilderHired
Founded1995—
Headquarters—Jacksonville, Florida, USA (parent LHH)
Employees1,001–5,0005,000+
FundingVenture round led by New Enterprise AssociatesSeries D · $133M raised
Best for—Employers hiring tech and sales talent

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

CareerBuilder

  • multi-channel job distribution

    Hired

    Profile in progress.

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “CareerBuilder vs Hired”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/careerbuilder-vs-hired, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.